From: Ethical challenges with the left ventricular assist device as a destination therapy
Participants |
---|
• Patient |
• Surrogate decision maker or medical power of attorney |
• Caregiver (spouse, adult child, significant other, etc.) |
• Primary care physician |
• Palliative care specialist |
• Cardiology specialist |
• Cardiovascular surgical specialist |
• Clergy |
• Social services |
Information content |
• Description of end-stage heart failure disease and natural history |
• Description of optimal medical management |
• Description of palliative care and symptom management |
• Description of hospice services |
• Description of surgical procedure for device implantation |
• Description of benefits from device implantation over optimal medical management |
• Description of complications after device implantation |
   ‣ Short-term operative death or complications |
   ‣ Expected time of hospitalization and recovery from the surgical procedure |
   ‣ Expected survival time after device implantation |
   ‣ Expected quality of life (e.g., physical, psychological, social, and financial) |
   ‣ Long-term complications |
â—‹ Device-related complications |
â–ªComplications after open-heart surgery |
â–ªNeurologic complications |
â–ªInfections |
â–ªDevice troubleshooting |
â–ªDevice malfunction and failure |
â–ªPain |
â–ªNoise and sleep-related disorder |
â—‹ Concurrent or new clinically significant comorbid conditions and diseases |
   ‣ Notification or training of local hospital personnel and doctors |
   ‣ Transfer to regional hospitals for inpatient specialized medical care |
   ‣ Frequency of regular follow-up visits |
   ‣ Frequency of inpatient readmissions |
   ‣ Development of new intractable symptoms from right heart failure |
   ‣ Advance care planning and documentation (e.g., in event of a stroke, serious infection, device replacement, loss of decision-making capacity, or disseminated malignancy) |
   ‣ Anticipated end-of-life trajectories |
   ‣ Palliative and hospice care with or without device implantation |
   ‣ Device deactivation and death planning (when and where to "turn off" the device) |
   ‣ Device procedures in end-of-life organ donation |
• Description of short-term and long-term medical care costs with or without device implantation |
• Caregiver burden after device implantation |
   ‣ Physical |
   ‣ Psychological |
   ‣ Social |
   ‣ Cultural |
   ‣ Financial |
   ‣ Daily life activities and work or employment |
Communication tools |
• Face-to-face interviews |
• Device patients' support groups |
• Caregivers' support groups |
• Audiovisual media |
• Electronic media (Web sites) |
• Printed media (brochures) |
Verification of understanding of the relevant information (i.e., the patient and the caregiver should paraphrase the disclosed information) |
• Nature of the patient's medical condition |
• Nature and purpose of the surgical procedure for device implantation |
• Benefits and risks of device implantation |
• Benefits and risks of optimal medical management |
• Caregiver burden |
• Anticipated changes in end-of-life trajectories |
• Palliative and hospice care access with or without device implantation |
• End-of-life care planning |
• Mode of dying and death |
Validation of first-person (patient) informed decision making |
• Patient acknowledges seriousness of medical condition and likely consequences |
• Patient compares medical and device therapies and consequences of each option |
• Patient offers reasons for not selecting medical therapy as an option |
• Patient offers reasons for selecting device implantation as an option |